In this part I take on Laci Green and infantilization of our sexual culture.

part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jLoPHKaVgY&t=536s
part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fSj5IcwHpE

My main channel page : https://www.youtube.com/thedistributist
Website : distributist.wordpress.com
Twitter : https://twitter.com/DataDistribute

Please leave questions and reactions. As always, like, share, and subscribe!
Click this link to GET ====>>>
Ed Reverser – Conversion Monster W/ Huge Payouts (view mobile)

27 COMMENTS

  1. If I had it my way, we'd be able to arrest and lock up that Queer Kids Stuff tranny for sexually abusing children. If you show pornography to a child you can be arrested. I don't see much difference between the methods of subverting children when the end result is the same. They are making kids think they are gay, or transgender, by corrupting them before they're ready to explore sexuality.

  2. Your experience of learning about sex doesn't mean it was common that people rarely knew what sex was before a more liberal education began. From my own experience, people in the 5th grade and early middle school already knew about sex before sex education was provided for these students. And going by teen pregnancy data, there would seem to be a significant amount of people who knew what sex was before reaching the age of twenty even in the 1940's. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db89.pdf

    You keep making huge leaps of logic throughout this series. Teaching children about sex infantilizes sex for adults? How and in what way? You don't explain but rather ironically point to affirmative consent laws as somehow saying that there is no consequence to sex. Affirmative consent laws do no such thing and in fact give an explicit case where sex has very real consequences, viz. sex without consent. Affirmative consent laws are rules that lay out how a government should prosecute a case of sexual assault or rape. This says nothing about whether people can feel emotional harm from engaging in sex, whether sex can result in pregnancy that the two people would be responsible for, or other such possible consequences. You continually make this mistake in assuming that the people advocating for voluntary informed consent think the only way sex can be bad is if there wasn't voluntary informed consent. But the people I've heard would also advise against sex where someone in the relationship wasn't very happy with the sexual relationship and instead would advise the people in the relationship to talk about the issue and find out what is wrong. It's pretty much absurd to accuse these people of making sex a situation where people don't believe they have any responsibility when these people continually advocate for getting the consent of their partner, using protection, attending to the needs of their partner (either emotionally or sexually), not cheating on one's partner, and other such positions that indicate a level of responsibility for the people involved.

  3. Kids are super impressionable. Just the other day my daughter dumped food on a kid at school because someone told her to. She is 7 and doesn't normally do this. Kids will pretty much do whatever, so encouraging them in any sort of sexualized activity I see as abuse.

  4. don't forget the LGBTQ chant … it pretty much explains the advance on children.

    Before they're 8 or it's too late.

    Before they're 8 or it's too late.

    Before they're 8 or it's too late.

    self evident?

  5. Great video. Only wish you would have mention Huxley, using sex to implament totalitarian control was the plan for a long long time.

    "There are already certain American cities in which the number of divorces is equal to the number of marriages. In a few years, no doubt, marriage licenses will be sold like dog licenses, good for a period of twelve months, with no law against changing dogs or keeping more than one animal at a time. As political and economic freedom diminishes, sexual freedom tends compensatingly to increase. And the dictator (unless he needs cannon fodder and families with which to colonize empty or conquered territories) will do well to encourage that freedom. In conjunction with the freedom to daydream under the influence of dope and movies and the radio, it will help to reconcile his subjects to the servitude which is their fate."

    http://www.mrtom.com/quotes/huxley_essay.htm

  6. A couple of questions here that may not seem relevant.
    1) Have you read Hayek's a "Road to Serfdom"?
    2) How familiar are you with the events that lead to the rise of the National Socialist Party and the Bolshevik revolution?
    3) Have you read J.D Unwin's work "Sex and Culture"?
    4) Are you familiar with "The Fate of Empires and Search for Survival" by Glubb?

    I think you may find their analysis quite fascinating if you are not already familiar with it. I disagree with many of the conclusions that the later authors present, but their breakdown of the evidence is very applicable to our current world. In many ways our world in America looks disturbingly like it did before those major transitions.

  7. Children are increasingly exposed to sex regardless of progressive sex ed. The way people dress, television and music are much more sexually explicit than they were. Children have access to hardcore porn. While they go too far, at least the progs are trying to manage these influences by educating children.

  8. I'd say the way of getting rid of people that take pride in sexual identity is to be rid of pridful labels that have no merit all together, like race identity and sex identity and yeah nation identity. If you didn't work for it you can't be proud of it.

    You can be proud of being a "usefull citezen" but then you're proud of your utility not of your nationality.

  9. The slippery slope of authoritarian control of human behavior correlates ominously with all the new surveillance technology. Has Sargon booked you for a stream yet? And on another note, Thorium is back… but has decayed into Adolfinium 1488.

  10. It seems to be that the end game of the elites is the breeding of some kind of master race. And they use transgenderism and homosexuality as a means to cut people out of breeding populations?

  11. Hey! most of the time I agree with you, but I think you go a bit too far. I think a lot shortcuts are taken to create the narrative you "need" to make your point.
    Would you be interested in a skype discussion?

  12. 0:51
    When you say "does not believe in the lifestyle that they promote,"
    Do you mean that you literally don't believe gay people exist? Or do you mean you don't believe in it as in you don't endorse it? Do you mean you are against it? I don't understand why what two consenting adults do in their bedroom is any concern of yours. Even if you're going to chock it up to "God said it's not cool," it's your God's job to judge people, not yours. Very confusing

  13. The sexualisation of children seems to be something that's been happening for a while.

    Time magazine had a front cover saying, "Transgenders, America's next civil rights frontier". It made me wonder why they didn't say "the final frontier", and not the "next frontier". Where else can we go from Transgender civil rights? What else needs to be normalized?

    That made me think that logically there has to be a final frontier at some point. There has to be some point where having more civil rights is excessive or there has to be at least some civil rights movements that's immoral or harmful.

    But ever since Progressives took the moral banner of civil rights, there's no such thing as a "final civil rights frontier", no such thing as a protesting progressive being wrong about a particular issue. Progressives are right by default. There is no debate or discussion to be had and you're a bigot for even raising questions.

    That's why I think it's only a matter of time till we see "Pedophilia, the next civil rights frontier". There's no breaks on this vehicle and we're already seeing the signs.

  14. There are a lot claims you really need to substantiate here. This 3rd video seemed to go off the rails a bit; not completely. Also, what possible moral argument for being opposed to homosexuality could you have? Is this position arbitrary or predicated upon some evidence? Is your moral construction of reality based in mathematical positives weighed against negatives?

    Would you be interested in discussing this in good faith and off the record on Skype, or do you have some videos you could direct me too that might better articulate your positions found in this particular video?

  15. With ubiquitous pornography online I don't really see the problem with sex education, other than the fact that it's coming from Laci Green. In fact some sort of Sex Ed might be something of a necessity nowdays.

  16. Ugh, I've been getting into Internet fights with a militant atheists that claims that because God didn't care if people owned slaves, that means He is an immoral monster. He says that I have been "indoctrinated by the cult" and that only my "secular values" prevent me from becoming an evil monster. Help?

  17. How does sex education sexualize children. If anything it takes the fun and mystery out of sex and lays bare all the dangers.

    Throughout all prehistory and much of history females were having sex as soon as they could get pregnant. Marriage in medieval Europe happened at a young age, even as young as 12.

  18. Interesting video. You made a good point about the citizen as consumer that could be explored further. Perhaps this has little to do with sexuality at all and is more about gaining control. Infantilization has been a consistent theme in recent years, therefore the fact that children are affected could even be a coincidence.

LEAVE A REPLY